Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1985

reference
211-tree-1
name
1985
tree-preservation-order

undefined

211-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006555 50.900307)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006498 50.900301,-1.006501 50.900312,-1.006509 50.900323,-1.006521 50.900331,-1.006537 50.900336,-1.006554 50.900338,-1.006572 50.900336,-1.006588 50.900331,-1.006601 50.900323,-1.006609 50.900313,-1.006612 50.900302,-1.006609 50.900291,-1.006601 50.900281,-1.006589 50.900273,-1.006573 50.900268,-1.006556 50.900266,-1.006538 50.900267,-1.006522 50.900272,-1.006509 50.900280,-1.006501 50.900290,-1.006498 50.900301)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL